Have you ever realized that some virtual machines are faster than others? This is generally due to how they are devised — either through a technique called full virtualization or paravirtualization. If you have used a hypervisor system such as VMware, VirtualBox, or KVM, you will have come across these terms. Let’s explain them in the simplest way possible.
The hypervisor simulates the hardware and the guest operating system (Windows or Linux) is unaware this is not real hardware.
Examples:
Cons - It is slower, as your system uses processing power to "fool" the hardware.
The operating system is only slightly changed to communicate with the hypervisor using special API calls. In this case, we can think of the OS as saying “Hey, I think I’m virtual- why don’t we make this work together?”
Examples:
The bad: The operating system must be modified to work in this way, therefore not all operating systems can work together.
Personally, I bundled KVM because it gives you both - KVM allows you to run full virtualization, while also allowing you to use paravirtual drivers so you can have the best of both worlds.
So the next time you are provisioning a VM you will want to ask yourself - "do I want speed? or flexibility?" Once you figure that out, your choice will be clear.
What Is Full Virtualization?
Think of full virtualization as a computer, acting like it is another computer. The virtual machine (VM) believes it is talking to real hardware, but it is in fact talking to a software layer called a hypervisor.The hypervisor simulates the hardware and the guest operating system (Windows or Linux) is unaware this is not real hardware.
Examples:
- VMware ESXi
- Microsoft Hyper-V
- Oracle VirtualBox
Cons - It is slower, as your system uses processing power to "fool" the hardware.
What Is Paravirtualization?
Paravirtualization is different. In this case, the guest OS understands that it is in a virtual machine. Instead of lying to the operating system, it communicates directly with the hypervisor to do tasks more efficiently.The operating system is only slightly changed to communicate with the hypervisor using special API calls. In this case, we can think of the OS as saying “Hey, I think I’m virtual- why don’t we make this work together?”
Examples:
- Xen
- KVM (using special drivers)
The bad: The operating system must be modified to work in this way, therefore not all operating systems can work together.
Which One Should You Choose?
If you wish to run multiple types of operating systems, full virtualization makes sense. However, if you want as fast of an experience with the least impact on resources, paravirtualization is the way to go.Personally, I bundled KVM because it gives you both - KVM allows you to run full virtualization, while also allowing you to use paravirtual drivers so you can have the best of both worlds.
In Conclusion
In a nutshell, both paravirtualization and full virtualization essentially provide the same outcome - running multiple systems on a single machine, using a different approach.So the next time you are provisioning a VM you will want to ask yourself - "do I want speed? or flexibility?" Once you figure that out, your choice will be clear.
